Everyone lately seems to be going "all-friends-only all-the-time" with their journals. What's up with that? Are people becoming more zealous about their privacy, or has other stuff been going down that I just haven't seen?
I see no need to go friends-only here. I already protect individual posts that I don't intend for unfiltered consumption, and everything else is so mundane and inconsequential I can't imagine why anyone would care.
I see no need to go friends-only here. I already protect individual posts that I don't intend for unfiltered consumption, and everything else is so mundane and inconsequential I can't imagine why anyone would care.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-19 05:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-19 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-19 05:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-19 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-19 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-19 06:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-19 06:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-19 05:31 pm (UTC)When you think about it, it is silly to think that someone could steal your info, use it against you - whatever. However, once it's been done, it can't be un-done. Then all you can do is wish that you'd been more careful all along.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-19 05:38 pm (UTC)I have several people on my list that have been FO for a long time. I've never really considered it, myself.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-19 09:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-19 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-19 05:38 pm (UTC)* work - Kept private for obvious reasons.
* money (including big sales/purchases) - I don't want any signs of my financial status, good or bad, in a public space.
* other people (friends or family) - Cyberstalking is made easier through unfiltered blogging. Not that I expect my friends would be targets, but I think that it's courteous to provide some periphery privacy
As a result, it seems like I friends-lock about 75% of my posts. As a result, the remaining 25% is kind of trivial material, but at least it serves as a sign that I am actively on here and posting things.
What I would really like to see would be an LJ feature that would let you extend "friends privileges" to "friends of friends." For the most part, I generally trust the company my friends keep and I wouldn't mind sharing with the "extended network," but there isn't a way to easily set it up.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-19 06:18 pm (UTC)As far as your wish-list feature, it sounds interesting but probably hard to implement. If you think about how many friends you have, then how many unique friends they, you could already be talking hundreds of people. Unless you were very selective about who you add to your own friends list, you would be policing an awful lot of people.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-19 08:44 pm (UTC)I don't really expect my friends' friends to look at my LJ unless they get really bored, but sometimes I would like to refer to a private post on my own LJ in a friend's posts comments. In those cases I would generally want the comment readers to be able to read that post without friending them all or publicizing the post.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-19 05:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-19 06:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-19 10:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-19 07:34 pm (UTC)Anything I post about my job(s) is friends-only due to my not wanting various and sundry to see it and because sometimes it'd be negatively representing the folks in question.
Sex stuff, for obvious reasons, though my mother is on my list, which kinda defeats the purpose.
And then there's the very basic "It's my house, and folks didn't play by my rules" issue. Some years ago, some troll came a-trollin' and ... well, yeah. So these days, I'm taking a different approach to things.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-19 08:48 pm (UTC)Sorry.... =)
no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 09:50 am (UTC)I don't want information I talk about doctors and professors to be known (whether good or bad).
Some of my rants I don't want someone to find out.
If my parents search for me, I don't want them to see my posts.